I'm a Committed Capitalist, Yet Medicare for All Represents the Best Hope for American Healthcare

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. ACA. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. POS. HDHP. HSA. FSA. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who comprehends this complex system? Not the typical entrepreneur. Neither the average worker. Choosing the right healthcare insurance for our business – or for our families – seems like it requires advanced expertise in medical insurance.

Our Healthcare System Is More Than Complicated, It Is Expensive

According to a recent study, the average family pays $twenty-seven thousand annually for their health insurance (increasing by 6% from last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is expected to exceed $seventeen thousand for each worker by 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Now the government is shut down due to partisan disputes over tax credits that experts say will lead to a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

When will we seriously consider a national health insurance program here in America? I'm convinced we're approaching that point since this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm proposing for our current Medicare system – an insurance system – simply expand to cover everyone. Our infrastructure remains intact. The way medical professionals receive payment changes. Trust me, they'll adapt.

How National Health Insurance Would Work

Universal healthcare coverage would require payments from both employees and employers. In similar programs, an employee earning moderate income must contribute about 5.3% toward medical coverage. The company pays approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear like a lot? Not if you contrast that with what the typical American pays. I can name dozens of clients that are easily contributing anywhere from 8% to 15% of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. Remember that with inclusive programs, those payments include retirement benefits, sick pay, parental benefits and job loss protection along with funding healthcare facilities. When you add those costs compared with what we pay for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Execution in the US

For America, a national health premium would increase existing Medicare taxes, a system already established. It ought to be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would pay more than lower-income earners. There would be both an employee and employer contribution. Similar to many our government's defense, IT, social programs and infrastructure, the program should be outsourced by private contractors rather than federal agencies.

Benefits for Small Businesses

Universal healthcare coverage would be a huge benefit for small businesses like mine. It would place small companies in equal competition against big corporations who can afford better plans. It would make administration much easier (automatic payroll withholding remitted like social security and Medicare taxes, rather than separate payments to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would enable it easier to plan expenses annual expenditures, rather than enduring the complex (and ineffective) theater of negotiating with the big insurance providers that we must do each year. Because it's simplified, there would be improved comprehension about benefits by our employees – contrasted with existing arrangements which require them to decipher the complications of existing plans. And there would certainly be reduced responsibility for companies since we wouldn't have access to our employees' medical records for weighing risks and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as they get. However I recognize that public institutions play important functions in our lives, including national security to supporting essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage to all via universal healthcare strengthens economic foundations. It represents superior, easier system for small businesses that employ the majority of American employees and fund half of our GDP. It enables for workers to enjoy better health, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Are there numerous factors I haven't covered? Of course there are. But with all the healthcare cost increases we've seen in recent years, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. I understand that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms are easier to implement. But expanding Medicare for all, despite the additional taxes that would be incurred, would still be a better and less expensive strategy both for managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, must reduce national pride. America's medical care isn't so great. We rank significantly behind many other countries in healthcare quality globally, according to comprehensive research. Perhaps a bright spot in this present circumstances could be that we take serious examination in the mirror and agree that major reforms are necessary.

John Bush
John Bush

A tech enthusiast with over a decade of experience in gaming industry analysis, specializing in slot machine innovations and digital trends.